By Brian French, Florida Business News Writer
How the Loss of Manufacturing Jobs Fuels Competition and Suppresses Prosperity
Over the past several decades, the United States has witnessed a dramatic decline in manufacturing jobs, a trend that has reshaped the labor market and squeezed workers into an increasingly limited range of industries. This shift has intensified competition, fragmented revenue streams, and eroded the economic stability of millions of Americans.
A revitalization of U.S. manufacturing could reverse this trend, broaden employment opportunities, and restore higher wages and a better standard of living for workers in the long term.
The Decline of U.S. Manufacturing and Its Ripple Effects
Manufacturing was once the backbone of the American economy, providing stable, well-paying jobs to millions of workers, particularly those without advanced degrees. In 1979, manufacturing employed over 19 million Americans, accounting for nearly 22% of the workforce. By 2023, that number had plummeted to just over 13 million, representing less than 9% of total employment, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
This decline, driven by globalization, automation, and trade policies favoring offshoring, has forced displaced workers to seek opportunities in a shrinking pool of industries, primarily in the service sector.
The service industry—encompassing retail, hospitality, healthcare, and gig work—has absorbed much of this displaced labor. However, unlike manufacturing, which historically offered unionized jobs with predictable hours and benefits, many service jobs are low-wage, precarious, and lack upward mobility.
As workers flood into these sectors, the supply of labor outpaces demand, creating a hyper-competitive environment. For example, in a small town that once supported a single diner or repair shop, there might now be five competing businesses, each struggling to capture a share of limited consumer spending. This fragmentation dilutes revenues, leaving businesses with razor-thin margins and workers with stagnant wages.
The Consequences of a Narrowing Employment Landscape
The concentration of workers in fewer industries has far-reaching consequences. First, it intensifies competition among businesses within the same sector. In oversaturated markets, such as ride-sharing or food delivery, multiple providers vie for the same customers, driving down prices and profits.
This dynamic benefits consumers in the short term but leaves businesses unable to invest in growth or offer employees better pay or benefits. For instance, the proliferation of gig economy platforms has led to a race to the bottom, with drivers earning less per ride as companies compete on price.
Second, the lack of industry diversity limits workers’ bargaining power. In the heyday of manufacturing, workers could negotiate better wages and conditions due to the demand for skilled labor and the presence of unions. Today, with fewer options, workers are often forced to accept lower wages and less favorable conditions.
The median hourly wage for manufacturing jobs in 2023 was approximately $25, compared to just $16 for retail and $14 for hospitality, according to BLS data. This wage gap underscores how the shift to service-based employment has eroded economic security.
Finally, the narrowing of employment options stifles social mobility. Manufacturing jobs historically provided a pathway to the middle class for workers with high school diplomas or vocational training. As these jobs have disappeared, workers are increasingly funneled into low-skill, low-wage roles with little opportunity for advancement.
This trend disproportionately affects rural and industrial communities, where the loss of factories has left entire regions economically hollowed out.
The Case for Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
A strategic return to domestic manufacturing could alleviate these pressures and foster a more resilient economy. By investing in industries such as clean energy, semiconductors, and advanced manufacturing, the U.S. could diversify its employment landscape, reducing the oversaturation of service-based sectors. Policies like tax incentives for reshoring, infrastructure investments, and workforce retraining programs could spur the creation of millions of high-quality jobs.
Reviving manufacturing would also restore workers’ bargaining power. As demand for skilled labor grows, employers would need to offer competitive wages, benefits, and training opportunities to attract talent. Historical data supports this: during the manufacturing boom of the mid-20th century, real wages grew steadily, and workers enjoyed a higher standard of living. A modern manufacturing renaissance could replicate these outcomes, particularly in emerging sectors like electric vehicle production or renewable energy infrastructure, where global demand is surging.
Moreover, manufacturing jobs have a higher economic multiplier effect than service jobs. Each manufacturing job supports additional roles in supply chains, logistics, and local businesses, boosting community prosperity. For example, a 2019 study by the Economic Policy Institute found that every 100 manufacturing jobs created 291 indirect jobs, compared to just 87 for retail. This ripple effect could revitalize struggling regions and reduce the economic divide between urban and rural areas.
A Path Forward
To reverse the narrowing of employment and its consequences, policymakers must prioritize manufacturing as a cornerstone of economic recovery. This could include subsidies for domestic production, tariffs on offshored goods, and investments in vocational training to prepare workers for modern manufacturing roles. Public-private partnerships could also drive innovation in high-growth industries, ensuring the U.S. remains competitive globally.
The loss of manufacturing jobs has trapped American workers in a cycle of fierce competition and diminishing returns. By rebuilding a robust manufacturing sector, the U.S. can expand employment options, reduce market saturation, and create a foundation for higher wages and a better standard of living. The path to prosperity lies not in pitting workers against each other in an overcrowded service economy but in restoring the diverse, high-value opportunities that manufacturing once provided—and can provide again.
About the Author
